Translation for "named" to english

Named

• the named

Translation examples

the named

9) Cette constatation rejoint la position plus générale prise en doctrine selon laquelle "there is a potential for inequity in this aspect ['however phrased or named'] of the definition" (cet aspect de la définition ["quel que soit son libellé ou sa désignation"] comporte un risque d'inéquité) : "Under the Vienna Convention, the disadvantages of determining that a statement is a reservation are [...] imposed over the other parties to the treaty. [...] It would be unfortunate in such circumstances if the words 'however phrased or named' were given an overridding effect.
(9) This observation is consistent with the more general doctrinal position that “there is a potential for inequity in this aspect ['however phrased or named'] of the definition”: “Under the Vienna Convention, the disadvantages of determining that a statement is a reservation are [...] imposed over the other parties to the treaty. [...] It would be unfortunate in such circumstances if the words “however phrased or named” were given an overriding effect.

d) Les poursuites engagées directement contre des agents fédéraux en vue d'obtenir des dommages-intérêts pour violation des droits consacrés par la Constitution (<<constitutional torts>>) (voir Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971); Davis v. Passman, 442 U.S. 228 (1979));
Suits against federal officials directly for damages under provisions of the U.S. Constitution for "constitutional torts," see Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971); Davis v. Passman, 442 U.S. 228 (1979);

Cette constatation rejoint la position plus générale prise en doctrine selon laquelle «there is a potential for inequity in this aspect [“however phrased or named”] of the definition» (cet aspect de la définition [«quel que soit son libellé ou sa désignation»] comporte un risque d’inéquité) : «Under the Vienna Convention, the disadvatanges of determining that a statement is a reservation are [...] imposed over the other parties to the treaty. [...] It would be unfortunate in such circumstances if the words “however phrased or named” were given an overidding effect.
297. This observation is consistent with the more general doctrinal position that “there is a potential for inequity in this aspect [‘however phrased or named’] of the definition”: “Under the Vienna Convention, the disadvantages of determining that a statement is a reservation are ... imposed over the other parties to the treaty. [...] It would be unfortunate in such circumstances if the words ‘however phrased or named’ were given an overriding effect.